Krikey, do we live on the same planet?!
Wait... OneHost.ws didn't survive because of the cheap prices they had (you said that, not me).. so you sign up with another company with the same prices? that makes no sense.
First off, I didn't speculate at all as to why onehost.ws folded; I don't know, I wasn't there, I just know they're gone now. Second, since you seem to be having undue difficulty understanding the sense of my decision, let me try to put it in terms you'll understand:
Imagine your special ed teacher offered you an apple for lunch for a dollar. Then imagine that you told the lunchlady about it and she offered you another apple of the same size, also for a dollar, even though cafeteria apples normally cost twice as much. Now imagine that you remember one of your classmates (the kid in the helmet) buying an apple from the teacher last week, only to bite into it and find the insides brown and grainy, and half a worm... The cafeteria apples, on the other hand, are renown for being delicious and worm-free. Who would you buy your apple from?!
Uh-huh. Objectionable content can be considered as adult content, pornographic material, niicce. That's what I need.. to host some porno so I can be hit with DDOS attacks and have to risk getting into legal actions with the court systems because some 13 year accessed it.
Oh no! *gasp* Porn! Run for the hills, AGGGHHH! Puh-leeze, don't even try making porn out to be the bad guy- the net woulda never taken off without it and the people that lawfully supply it (due to OUR incessant demand mind you!) do NOT deserve to be treated as second-class citizens, or customers in this case. Moreover, "objectionable content" isn't limited to porn by any means; it can be ANYTHING that rubs a host the wrong way, and if they have a "OC" clause chances are they can suspend your account with indemnity. I'm not comfy working in such a hypocritical, restrictive environment, hence I'm at Snake.
And BTW, your comment about falling victim to a DOS attack really commands confidence in your security measures, and the 13-year-old thing is just too silly to even respond to.
You stated you were in the market for hosting 6 months ago, does not mean you've been with them for 6 months.
M'kay, but then RIGHT AFTER THAT I said "But now, after being with them for 6 happy months," which I thought was fairly straightforward.
I don't need beg my clients to come in here and "review" my service, wait I mean place an advertisment that I email them in exchange for discoutn hosting.
I wasn't suggesting that you beg any of your clients to come over and review you, I was suggesting that YOU answer the questions on behalf of your company instead of wasting time trying to piss higher up a wall than me!
Features? Now you want to compare my company to Snake-Inc.com? LOL too funny.
Yeah, looking at your AUP I totally agree; hi-frickin-larious! It's obvious to me now why you've been so keen to avoid comparing your policies, but you might as well say something about it now, before I start pasting from your site.
LH:
I may not have 1000+ posts to my name but I've used FWS for years to find hosts. In fact, I got snake's name from here originally. Can I prove these things? No. Not unless Jan or somebody wants to go and see how far back my IP is in the access log. Anyway the point is I have an opinion and it was assuredly not an ad nor a "big ole heaping pile o spam." I don't know the deal with chronohost or whatever but if he left me in a position where I'll have to do more to convince you of my sincerity, so be it. My site URL (as stated in my original post) is severusforever.us and yes, I have proof of the date of my order with snake. I'm not going to supply the latter however, b/c it's just a text file that I could easily make to say whatever date I want, so either you just trust me when I say July 2, 2003, or you don't. And a thousand apologies- it seems I'm in my 5th month with snake, not 6th as I had previously thought.
Copyright-infringement-people:
People... If some dude is pirating DVD's in his house and gets caught, whom do you think is charged- the guy burning the discs, or his landlord? This doesn't even need to be rhetorical- take the recent RIAA suits against the swappers on Kazaa; not their ISP's, nor Kazaa itself, nor their bloody PC manufacturers, just THEM!