1. Howdy! Welcome to our community of more than 125.000 members devoted to web hosting. This is a great place to get special offers from web hosts and post your own requests or ads. To start posting sign up here. Cheers! /Peo, FreeWebSpace.net
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Add your web host to our brand new web hosting directory (beta).
    Dismiss Notice

WHMCS or HostBill?

Discussion in 'Host Talk' started by treznax, Nov 24, 2010.

?

See Below

  1. HostBill

    14 vote(s)
    15.7%
  2. WHMCS

    75 vote(s)
    84.3%
  1. Tyler

    Tyler Well-Known Member NLC

    Seeing as almost all of the large Post2Host sites have pretty much died out in the last year or two because people would rather spend $2 a month for shared hosting, there's not much point in such a module IMHO. That being said, you're always free to script your own Post2Host module -- nobody is stopping you. There's no reason to fault the billing system just because it doesn't come with a Post2Host module by default.
     
  2. JerrickYeoh

    JerrickYeoh New Member

    i do use WHMCS and Hostbill as well.
    I may feel that WHMCS is more user friendly and more flexible while you can find out that lot of this topic in other forum .
    And most of them support WHMCS more than Hostbill.
     
  3. UpReseller

    UpReseller New Member

    I have one WHMCS and one HostBill. As many people think, I'll vote for WHMCS, but HostBill has enough features if you really don't have enough money to pay for WHMCS license.
     
  4. WooWeb

    WooWeb New Member

    WHMCS is better than Hostbill.
     
  5. George S

    George S New Member

    Having used both - I can safely say I prefer WHMCS. The interface is cleaner, the software is much more flexible in terms of addons and customization, no tiers in terms of "unlocking" new features. The WHMCS pricing is straight forward and easy to understand (and doesn't keep changing).
     
  6. King-Servers

    King-Servers New Member

    No doubt, WHMCS is best option to consider.
     
  7. wsac

    wsac Active Member

    Whmcs 100% :)
     
  8. Vincentas

    Vincentas Member

    We're using WHMCS, but it's so far from perfect...
     
  9. tk-hassan

    tk-hassan Member

    I have only used WHMCS and never had any problems , never used HostBill.
     
  10. tlchosting

    tlchosting Active Member

    Host bill is a good software but when it comes to customer service it was rubbish.
     
  11. Vincentas

    Vincentas Member

    I am using WHMC as well. However, there are some things that it just doesn't support, but all can be handled if you have a good technical staff. When talking about HostBill the better thing that I see more useful than WHMC is that it has more updates on software which is about 2 updates per one week.
     
  12. MarionMcNair

    MarionMcNair Member

    I prefer Hostbill, it is providing many features as well as it does not need to renew annually.
     
  13. Imbahost-Andy

    Imbahost-Andy New Member

    WHMCS is very intuitive and user-friendly, so my vote goes for WHMCS!
     
  14. SKISLAL

    SKISLAL Member

    WHMCS seems like the ─▒ndustry standard. Almost. But remember, competition is good for us. And we need hostbill, blesta, client exec around.
     
  15. whmcsapps

    whmcsapps New Member

    WHMCS 100% :)
     
  16. cwvps

    cwvps Member

    Definitely WHMCS. I'm with it from the beginning and don't have an intention on changing it.
     
  17. GigaRank

    GigaRank UFO Hunter NLC

    Owned WHMCS license here, no plans for change. Work's very well!

    Sent from my SM-T310 using Tapatalk
     
  18. boyfrenship91

    boyfrenship91 New Member

    WHMCS probably about that. A long time of utilization and haven't found any great choices yet other than Ubersmith
     
  19. hongta

    hongta New Member

    Hostbill is better
     

Share This Page