Stop Spreading False Rumours with No Evidence
bryceton said:
I disagree with you there,
that site is full of cheating, many owners, or staff of webhosts rate themself high. (for example polurnet is rated third highest but whats not so obvious is some ratings where done by staff members of polurnet to increase there ratings)
I wouldnt mind if the owner of webhostingjury would actually remove these silly reviews but they wont i tried reporting hem before
Rate ourselves?! You must be more than just idiotic to believe make such a flawed, unethical allegation, and definately demonstrating your incompetent, baseless accusations with obvious intentions to spread fake rumours, in a feeble attempt to gain credibility.
Firstly, your accusation of 'staff' posting testimonials itself is one that can be damaged with simple reasoning: ever realize that customers, who themselves tried our services and at a later a timepplied to become part of our staff? It just goes to show you how many of our customers are knowledgeable in the hosting field, and have enough expertise in their respective department to be able to apply for a staff position once they go through our intensive training procedures.
Secondly, your argument shows your feable attempt to cause commotion when there was none to start with: the people who run webhostingjury not only check the domains of each customer and email for proof of being a customer, but occaisionally phone them as well to verify identity as few of our clients pointed out; clearly an example of the trustworthiness of the reviews. Therefore, any reports you made were rejected on that basis, indicating more than just your ignorance.
Thirdly, speaking of us individually, with over thousands of customers, unlike a one-man show like your
unregistered 'company' (not even a close qualification for your website) , we have hundreds of reviews at several reknown places such as NamePros.com, DNForum.com, Freewebspace.net, Webhostingopinions.com, Webhostingtalk, and many others; demonstrating your so-called attempt to attack is not only unjustifiable, unwarranted and fallacious, but as well as a childish attempt to discredit an otherwise excellent place for honest reviews, not influenced by false advertising.
I suggest you read this thoroughly and attempt
(which will likely be an extremely difficult objective to reach in your case) to
understand it before you dare to reply to the evidence presented.
