Why is that Shared and Reseller prices greatly differ from each other, however they all came from the same server, consuming the same disk/BW...
what's really the reasons for this?.. why not just sell resellers for the same price of shared?..
sorry if i sound stupid, justy want to see the logic here.
From a web host's perspective, some random points
Shared hosting:
1: Many number of clients per server: Benefits such as more likelyhood of upgrading clients in the future.
2: More people referring your services to others.
3: Most clients use tiny resources, a fraction of their account. (Again if they have heavy sites, they'll have to upgrade!)
4: You directly control and know your clients.
5: More support to provide generally due to the higher numbers.
Reseller hosting:
1: You don't know what/who you are hosting: Larger possibilities of abuse going unnoticed. More abuse, more problems with your server, more downtime, lower reputation
2: Reseller hosting clients hardly ever refer you customers - they take them all.
3: A reseller client is always going to be a bigger pain in the butt compared to the relatively quiet shared clients, when problems happen: "I want my site back up now, my customers are killing me, I'm going to sue you.", you probably have the reseller client relaying you all their support questions.
4: There's nothing more annoying than a reseller, hosting 5 proxy sites and a free web host.