• Howdy! Welcome to our community of more than 130.000 members devoted to web hosting. This is a great place to get special offers from web hosts and post your own requests or ads. To start posting sign up here. Cheers! /Peo, FreeWebSpace.net
managed wordpress hosting

Looters in Iraq

Originally posted by Nick
What a heartless comment. Your "I just picked the United States because they were the first country to come to mind (as they were the most responsible for these events happening)." comment is complete bullshit because you have been quick to bash the United States recently.

Don't mistake me for a very patriotic person; HOWEVER, I will take offense when you say the value of lives of people who could very well be my family members is less than historic artifacts. Who the ---- are you to place any kind of value on someone's family? You are in absolutely NO POSITION place a value on the life of any human being whether they're American, Chinese, Iraqi, or any other nationality.

If you don't understand why I take such offense to this, how would you feel if I were to say "If we killed all of your family members, the loss of their life would not replace the loss of my tooth brush." I'm sure you would take offense, and if you were to say you didn't -- I would not believe it. Now, go ahead and throw up the argument that the value of a tooth brush isn't comparable to the lost artifacts. Different people have different perspectives when it comes to material objects, but NO ONE can put a value on the life of another human being.

Think before you are so quick to open your mouth.

Well Said. I'm afraid to open my mouth.
 
About time. The Iraqi's have formed their own groups to stop the looters, and have actually recovered much of it.

As for Conk....I think his words simply came out wrong.
 
I really can't see how it is the U.S. fault for this, sure we should have "guarded" the Museum, but on our defense, the Iraqi people should have a little more respect for their own country and not have done that. Oh wait, respect for their country? I don't think Saddam has taught them that, luckily for them the U.S. will.
I agree with ^^. This is up to the Iraqis, if they don't manage their own affairs how will they manage their country in the future? Everyone has got a part to play.
 
Originally posted by conkermaniac
I just picked the United States because they were the first country to come to mind (as they were the most responsible for these events happening)
THEY were the most responsible??

so its not saddam's fault, its not the UN's fault for not policing the situation like they were supposed to, its not the iraqi people's fault for destroying what is left of their heritage.....its America's fault!!!

Originally posted by conkermaniac
Utter discrimination of the Native Americans, if you ask me.
Tibet - enough said!!

Originally posted by conkermaniac
what I hate about many Americans ...
Conker you are a tool - a model citizen!!! good on ya!


p.s...i must add, i don't like to personally attack people's opinions on forums, where expressing one self can often come accross incorrectly or be misinterpreted, but Conker, you have done nothing but verbally bash the US for weeks now....you've made me so mad!!!!

you (and ALL of us) are in the very privileged position of being able to briefly converse with young people from all over the world, to learn something of the way of thinking of others outside our small society - to learn things from eachother that our teachers, our books and our parents can never teach us....yet all i read from Conker is hate of the US!!! i'm disgusted :mad:

either grow up and THINK before you lash out with your oft-harsh and single minded opinions, or don't partake in discussions about "grown up" issues

remember, there are always 3 sides to every story - your side, my side, and the truth
 
Let's try to stay away from personal attacks here, from both sides, ok? We disagree on a number of things and if you can't accept that you should most likely not participate in a public forum. This is not directed at someone in particular, it's a general comment on recent posts in the Iraq war threads.

Please discuss the issues and not the persons who post those views.
 
Let me add a little comments: I do think Saddam should be removed, but this would go down into history for the wrong reason, one that nailed the lid onto the coffin of UN, after all UN didn't give the go ahead, and it would give rise to more anti-americans, instead of pro-americans that president Bush was mentioning.
 
Originally posted by The Red Guy
Let me add a little comments: I do think Saddam should be removed, but this would go down into history for the wrong reason, one that nailed the lid onto the coffin of UN, after all UN didn't give the go ahead, and it would give rise to more anti-americans, instead of pro-americans that president Bush was mentioning.
I read this as: the UN didn't do as the US told it to so it doesn't have any function anymore.
The issue in the UN was upholding the sanctions, not regime chance. The question that needed to be answered was: "does Saddam have weapons that are in violation of the UN sanctions on Iraq". The US made a very poor case that didn't convince everyone and it wasn't willing to compromise hence the stalemate.
We'll see how the "pax America" holds up in the future.
 
Look...I have an American passport; I am an American citizen; and many Americans here would agree with my viewpoint! I do not think Americans should die in order to save these artifacts. I'm saying that the death of 100 million Americans would have less impact 8000 years down the road than the loss of these artifacts (8000 years from when they were made). Webdude is right in saying that my words "simply came out wrong". I apologize for my ambiguous comment.

You are hilarious Conk. You expect the Iraqi people to overthrow a dictator, but then blame the U.S. military for the Iraqi's failure to protect historical artifacts from their own looters. If you think they could have risen against their dictator, then why dont you think they could could have stopped the looting people on their own?
An Iraqi overthrow of Hussein would leave Iraq in anarchy for a short while, but they would be quicker to establish a new government. The United States are only now sending over "police" forces to control the area before they set up a government (which will be at least a few weeks, if not a month). But in the improbable case that looting does happen, yes, I would hold the revolutionary government responsible, just as I do the United States responsible for what is happening. But you and I both know very well that this would not have happened so quickly had the US not interfered.
However, with that said it doesn't give you a reason to insult the USA and our history. If you find it insignificant to X country then so be it but saying the American people don't respect history because they don't have much of their own is beyond wrong. I won’t even get in to that but hopefully you’ll at least acknowledge that point.
I'm not saying that Americans don't respect history. I'm saying that America focuses more on the 250-year history of United States than it does the world. That is unfortunate because it has made man Americans ignorant of what is happening in the world. The fact that the Treaty of Ghent or the Gold Rush of 1849 is more important than the Battle of Hastings or the Songhai Empire to many Americans is sad indeed. The fact that more Americans can find California (only the third biggest state in America) than the Pacific Ocean (the biggest ocean in the world) or Russia (the biggest country in the world) is humiliating. There are Americans who truly appreciate world history, but for the moment, the United States focuses itself far too much on itself and not enough on the rest of the world.

I again go back to the question: Will the Iraqi people be better off now or then? Blame the USA all you want but the bottom-line is the people responsible are those who looted. Most Iraqi citizens are just as appalled at the looting as we are. It only takes a few to make a lot of people look bad.
Yes, you are correct, but when there are so many people who will resort to looting, you must question whether the Iraqi people are capable of running an effective democracy with so many "bad apples" amongst their population.
 
Originally posted by AngelaAndJewel

Conker to say we don't have history is ludicrous. It may not go back as far but there is still history. We are one of the few countries who fought for independence and freedoms because we had the guts to do it. As far as the American indians are concerned there is a failure to mention that these atrocities also occured at the hands of the Spanish in South America not to mention many other countries with in their "HISTORY" of human degradation. The Spanish wiped out whole civilizations for gold and sugar and brought disease that did the rest in (syphillis was a big killer). I am getting sick and tired of the U.S.A. bashing. You got something to say stick to the point or start a new thread with bashing in mind.
And when did I assert that the Spanish are innocent? If there were any overly-patriotic Spaniards on the forum I'd probably say the same thing. All countries have had their faults, but it seems like Americans are the least willing to admit theirs. And the Japanese. But I'm pretty sure that the Soviets didn't run around the world proclaiming the liberation of the world from capitalism, yet America (and unfortunately, Americans as well) sees themselves as the "world liberators" -- promoting global democracy, freedom, capitalism, blah, blah, blah...where it's not needed and sometimes not wanted.
 
Originally posted by AngelaAndJewel
Overly Patriotic?? Is this because it is a differing opinion??

Perhaps you should read both of my posts before responding? :rolleyes:

But in any case, people who are overly patriotic -- yes, it is a differing opinion. What's your point? :devious2:
 
Originally posted by conkermaniac
I'm saying that the death of 100 million Americans would have less impact 8000 years down the road than the loss of these artifacts (8000 years from when they were made). Webdude is right in saying that my words "simply came out wrong". I apologize for my ambiguous comment.
I disagree with you on this but I think the best way to phrase what you mean is simply this: "The artifacts are irreplaceable and historical. There loss is tragic and nothing can fix the situation short of recovering the artifacts" There is no reason to mention a loss of human life regarding it.
Originally posted by conkermaniac
Yes, you are correct, but when there are so many people who will resort to looting, you must question whether the Iraqi people are capable of running an effective democracy with so many "bad apples" amongst their population.
I agree with you that some people don't have the best knowledge of history but that exists in every country. Heck the literacy rates in some countries are beyond horrible. It's not really relevant to the topic at hand though. I also understand your point about the people looting but I have to respectfully disagree. There will always be a portion of bad applies in a group but thankfully they are usually of the minority. As long as the majority of the people are well intentioned people with the peoples interest at heart they'll be fine.

You aren't anti-American for having an opposing viewpoint conkermaniac but people tend to have that view with your avatar, comments, and the "Long live Communism!" comment by your avatar. I'm not sure if you sincerely believe that's a better way for a country to be run but there are many others that agree with you. The majority of the population disagrees with you as it flies in the faces of everything the founding fathers did for us. Anyway, to avoid such labels just view both sides of an issue and acknowledge them. Most people are happy to respectfully disagree but if they think you're trying to play devils advocate to provoke them then there is a completely different attitude taken.

My only other advice is in general and applies to pretty much all of us. We should stick to the issues at hand instead of constantly trying to refer to outside issues. Otherwise the debate never really ends and no one benefits.
 
Originally posted by CareBear
I read this as: the UN didn't do as the US told it to so it doesn't have any function anymore.
The issue in the UN was upholding the sanctions, not regime chance. The question that needed to be answered was: "does Saddam have weapons that are in violation of the UN sanctions on Iraq". The US made a very poor case that didn't convince everyone and it wasn't willing to compromise hence the stalemate.
We'll see how the "pax America" holds up in the future.
Maybe I should've made it cleared: I meant now that Iraq is taken over by America coalition forces, it would give rise to anti-american feelings among the muslim world, which is opposite of the prediction mr president gave. Whether that would increase the number of terrorist attacks is unsure at present though.
 
I agree with you that some people don't have the best knowledge of history but that exists in every country. Heck the literacy rates in some countries are beyond horrible. It's not really relevant to the topic at hand though. I also understand your point about the people looting but I have to respectfully disagree. There will always be a portion of bad applies in a group but thankfully they are usually of the minority. As long as the majority of the people are well intentioned people with the peoples interest at heart they'll be fine.
If these were the only troublemakers in Iraqi society, that wouldn't nearly as bad, but who knows how many immoral, selfish Iraqis there are? I suspect that we've only seen a portion of these people. But it doesn't take a majority to influence the government. There are more Muslims than Jews in America, but I remember getting a day off from school for Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, while Arabic holidays seem to be ignored altogether.

You aren't anti-American for having an opposing viewpoint conkermaniac but people tend to have that view with your avatar, comments, and the "Long live Communism!" comment by your avatar. I'm not sure if you sincerely believe that's a better way for a country to be run but there are many others that agree with you. The majority of the population disagrees with you as it flies in the faces of everything the founding fathers did for us. Anyway, to avoid such labels just view both sides of an issue and acknowledge them. Most people are happy to respectfully disagree but if they think you're trying to play devils advocate to provoke them then there is a completely different attitude taken.
The avatar and the slogan is more of a joke than my personal viewpoint. I don't like Communism very much, although I do support socialism more than I do capitalism.

Again, I would like to reiterate that I am not any more anti-American than Webdude is anti-French (for posting insulting comments regarding the French culture) or anti-Muslim (for posting about the boycott of Middle Eastern oil). I could make a similar case about people being anti-Chinese in that Taiwan thread. But Webdude was only starting a discussion -- he was expressing his viewpoints, and there is nothing wrong with that.

My only other advice is in general and applies to pretty much all of us. We should stick to the issues at hand instead of constantly trying to refer to outside issues. Otherwise the debate never really ends and no one benefits.
That's very true, but sometimes arguments just flow together. Undoubtedly, the Israel/Palestine situation has to come up when one is discussing Islamic terrorism and the Iraq war.
 
I am not any more anti-American than Webdude is anti-French

Yep....still trying to think up a new name for the "French Kiss" since it got outlawed in the U.S. until there is a new official name for it. Thank god we're not pissed off at Missionaries.
 
Back
Top