http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,11069-1601051,00.html
Geez, are these idiots ever going to give up? If you're going to promote something to replace evolution, at least promote something that's at the very least scientific. What part of "Intelligent" Design has any thought involved? How are you supposed to do anything with "Intelligent" Design--are you saying that someday some unidentified creator will suddenly bless us with the cure to AIDS, even though research has been going on? There's nothing intelligent about "Intelligent" Design, and it's only an excuse by those people who deny that all of what they've learned from dogmatic religious orders is wrong and that there are no deities.
Like evolution, much of science is useful in prediction, such as turning back the clock and running very specific physics equations to see what early Earth looked like; same with matching up trees of DNA. Where the hell does "Intelligent" Design come into play? Unfortunately, we're in Kansas now, Dorothy...
Geez, are these idiots ever going to give up? If you're going to promote something to replace evolution, at least promote something that's at the very least scientific. What part of "Intelligent" Design has any thought involved? How are you supposed to do anything with "Intelligent" Design--are you saying that someday some unidentified creator will suddenly bless us with the cure to AIDS, even though research has been going on? There's nothing intelligent about "Intelligent" Design, and it's only an excuse by those people who deny that all of what they've learned from dogmatic religious orders is wrong and that there are no deities.
Like evolution, much of science is useful in prediction, such as turning back the clock and running very specific physics equations to see what early Earth looked like; same with matching up trees of DNA. Where the hell does "Intelligent" Design come into play? Unfortunately, we're in Kansas now, Dorothy...
Last edited: