host-tracker.com, Bullcraping me.

[Darknight]

I signed up for this for something to do and,

Hello,
http://internalx.net is now back to normal.
Operation restored at 2007-02-10 16:15:30.
Url was down as a resultat of:
Http error:Http_client.No_reply
Error was detected at 2007-02-10 14:17:48
Downtime total 1 hour(s) 57 min(s) 42 sec(s).
Check failures total: 4.

Iv had 0 downtime on this server :lol: All my IRCd's are running and have been running 24/7 5 -6 websites have also been fine? so, wtf are they lieing about this for :S.

Anyone know where I can go for a good uptime monitering service I also want to display server uptimes on my site

Thanks.

 

[Galaxy-Hosts.com]

Try webhostingstuff.com, they have a pretty nice service.

 

[Wojtek]

Hyperspin gets my vote

 

[Darknight]

Thanks people,
Thats what I needed.

 

[Starcraftmazter]

That used to happen a lot to me too, but not lately.

 

[Luegames]

host-tracker.com has been working for me lately.

But sometimes doesn't show when the site is down.

 

[krakjoe]

I don't see it gettin it wrong, it's not a person at the end of that service, as you know it's scripts, ones that execute the same code in the same order every single time, if it says your site is down, EVEN if apache is up then it's clearly not accessible by everyone on the planet, there's every change that thier scripts were denied a service because the IRC daemons were taking up all the resources, far more chance than machine code making mistakes .....

 

[amz]

Internalx, often site monitoring services will wrongly report sites down
which are actually fully online and accessible to everyone due to
routing problems out on the open internet somewhere between their
test server and your server and having nothing to do with you.

It is for this reason (and that they generate useless traffic) that we
completely banned the use of web monitoring services on our network
and we have a very sophisticated series of security systems in place
which utterly destroys the results of host-tracker.com and all other
web site monitoring services rendering them all completely useless
and can't make heads or tails out of any information from them.

If you don't like host-tracker giving incorrect reports about you,
maybe you should just kill them from accessing your server.

Intelligent people should be able to look at your site and see it
is actually online and host-tracker reporting 100% downtime
and figure out you must have blocked it somehow.

Stupid people --- well they don't need hosting accounts anyway
if they are stupid enough to blindly use monitoring service results
without actually checking their own site for uptime

 

[krakjoe]

Internalx, often site monitoring services will wrongly report sites down
which are actually fully online and accessible to everyone due to
routing problems out on the open internet somewhere between their
test server and your server and having nothing to do with you.

If it's not accessible by the monioring server, then theres a chance that it's not accessible to other internet users, regardless of wether it's a fault on your server or somewhere inbetween, your site is still inaccessible.

Again, code doesn't get it wrong.

 

[iLucas]

If it's not accessible by the monioring server, then theres a chance that it's not accessible to other internet users, regardless of wether it's a fault on your server or somewhere inbetween, your site is still inaccessible.

Again, code doesn't get it wrong.

You would think, with all the CyberToad security and "advances", they would atleast take some time and work on a decent index and theme integration.

 

[Fahrenheit]

If it's not accessible by the monioring server, then theres a chance that it's not accessible to other internet users, regardless of wether it's a fault on your server or somewhere inbetween, your site is still inaccessible.

Again, code doesn't get it wrong.

o you think that they provide one IP for monitoring while customers gt downtimes time by time?