This is a new PHProxy based site which I have coded.
The site features:
http://airproxy.jcink.com/
http://airproxy.jcink.com:82/
* No mess of ads
* List of proxies
* Easy tester, AJAx
* 4 urls so far, more pending
* Easy to change your IP to another proxy of your choice via the list, or other one that you find online.
The best feature of it in my view is something I spent a lot of time thinking about. The secure modes.
http://airproxy.jcink.com:82/?p=help#secure
http://airproxy.jcink.com:82/shakesbere.png
Read about them there and test some out yourself. The shakespeare idea ( http://shakespeare-wiki-links.jcink.com:82/ )can help keep you out of trouble if the URLs are being logged somewhere. I always found that a problem, and it exists in ALL the phproxies online.
Also. This is the ONLY PHProxy online that I have seen which lets you watch... yes... Youtube videos!. I put a lot of effort into that as well.
Note that this is currently in BETA, so there will be some problems. Any and all feedback is welcome. If anyone has suggestions, please let me know. We're also looking into offering HTTPS.
As a note, this week we use 82 instead of 88. I have found it's more accessable.
Thanks for looking.
The site features:
http://airproxy.jcink.com/
http://airproxy.jcink.com:82/
* No mess of ads
* List of proxies
* Easy tester, AJAx
* 4 urls so far, more pending
* Easy to change your IP to another proxy of your choice via the list, or other one that you find online.
The best feature of it in my view is something I spent a lot of time thinking about. The secure modes.
http://airproxy.jcink.com:82/?p=help#secure
http://airproxy.jcink.com:82/shakesbere.png
Read about them there and test some out yourself. The shakespeare idea ( http://shakespeare-wiki-links.jcink.com:82/ )can help keep you out of trouble if the URLs are being logged somewhere. I always found that a problem, and it exists in ALL the phproxies online.
Also. This is the ONLY PHProxy online that I have seen which lets you watch... yes... Youtube videos!. I put a lot of effort into that as well.
Note that this is currently in BETA, so there will be some problems. Any and all feedback is welcome. If anyone has suggestions, please let me know. We're also looking into offering HTTPS.
As a note, this week we use 82 instead of 88. I have found it's more accessable.
Thanks for looking.