• Howdy! Welcome to our community of more than 130.000 members devoted to web hosting. This is a great place to get special offers from web hosts and post your own requests or ads. To start posting sign up here. Cheers! /Peo, FreeWebSpace.net
managed wordpress hosting

Which is a better screen size?

Which is a better screen size?

  • 800x600

    Votes: 6 30.0%

  • 1024x768

    Votes: 9 45.0%

  • 1280 x 1024

    Votes: 2 10.0%

  • As most as your graphics card can do

    Votes: 3 15.0%
  • Total voters
    20
I use 1024.768 I would use more but I sit to far away from my monitor in my studio and can't see it.
 
Wouldn't that depend on your eyesight, what kind of work you use the computer for and THE SCREEN SIZE?

"800*600 is too small". Sheesh. :confused2
 
1920x1440 is what I'll be running soon...

1024x768 (my max res.) until then...

It all really depends on what you'll be using your PC for...
 
My main monitor is a 25' and I use 1152x870. It can go to 1600x1200....but sheesh, I wouldnt be able to read anything on that! I sit back away from my desk with a wireless mouse and wireless keyboard, with my feet up on on the desk. Any higher reso than I have now, and I have to sit like someone who is actually working instead of compfy :D

http://wzpro.net/webdude/images/desk.jpg
 
Originally posted by Webdude
Well, I guess mines the biggest then :D
Click to expand...
Well if you count dual monitors I use two 19" monitors. Not quite the same as a 25 though, nice! :)

I personally like this monitor:
http://www.apple.com/displays/acd23/

I just wonder how the video card would perform with two dual monitors at 3840x1200. Impressive set of monitors, to bad they will cost you $7,000 + a mac powerful enough to work with them. I've never been a big mac fan but OS X on two of those monitors would be quite impressive to say the least.
 
Originally posted by Akalon


Hell yes... look at the difference in browser space. Google barely fits on one screen! :eek:

http://www.scopewebdesign.com/files/browser800.png
http://www.scopewebdesign.com/files/browser1280.png

[ADD:] I personally like this monitor... oooh yeah.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes: Google is WebTV safe for pete's sake (540,480) :biggrin2:

What I meant thought that without knowing the size of the sceeen the resolution doesn't make much sense. I wouldn't like to use a 15# screen @ 1600- or a 19" @ 800*600 or lower. A person with bad eyesight may need even lower res on the other hand.
 
That's all depending on how large your monitor is and how small text you can put up with. I'm using 1024x768 on a 19 inch monitor. I can go quite higher than that, but I find it all too small when I do, so I don't.
 
Re: bling.bling

Originally posted by eclipticzero[2]
1600x1200 all tha way
Click to expand...
I thought you were banned?
Anyway, I think it all depends on the size of your monitor and how far you site from it. My dads office has a 21" monitor, the thing is huge! but he likes 1024X768 other wise I would use 1152x870
 
Re: Re: bling.bling

Originally posted by guitarnerd

I thought you were banned?
Click to expand...
We're going to watch his new account closely to see if he lives up to his promises. If not an IP ban will be placed on him, otherwise he will have taken advantage of the second chance we're providing him.

:topic:

Shame on you Todd. ;) Now returning to the thread.
 
Originally posted by Giancarlo
Actually that is not true. 1280X1024 has the slowest FPS for any graphics card for games... so I stuck with 1152X864. I believe that resolution is the one that takes the most advantage. Decent speed and good resolution.
Click to expand...
I play my games at 640x480 or 800x600, any higher the fps will be very slow.

I have a lousy graphics card(coz i'm using a laptop)...

anyway 1024x768 is the best for me, and also LCD screens only let you select one resolution that displays best.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top