-
Howdy! Welcome to our community of more than 130.000 members devoted to web hosting. This is a great place to get special offers from web hosts and post your own requests or ads. To start posting sign up here. Cheers! /Peo, FreeWebSpace.net
U.S Election 2004
- Thread starter trenzterra
- Start date
Fuzzylogic
New Member
i don't think you quite get the whole picture. what the US does in the world has a real effect elsewhere in the world. It may come as a real eye opener for some but we all share this little planet called earth and the US being so big (as a world power) needs to take time to consider what is does instead of always going in and finding out the consquences later.
As for my own leader, i support him for the good work he has done for the country, he certainly has done some bad things like all people but all up isn't all that bad.
Curtis i would in future just learn to live with criticism, yes bush is an idoit, you like everyone else will have to live with that some day. If he'd been the president of some other country then it wouldn't be such a problem but what he does has far reaching consquences as i mentioned above.
As for my own leader, i support him for the good work he has done for the country, he certainly has done some bad things like all people but all up isn't all that bad.
Curtis i would in future just learn to live with criticism, yes bush is an idoit, you like everyone else will have to live with that some day. If he'd been the president of some other country then it wouldn't be such a problem but what he does has far reaching consquences as i mentioned above.
America had a real tough decision, elect an idiot or a [d]ick[h]ead, a lose-lose situation really. I'm glad they voted the idiot in.
He gets support from our Prime Minister, so that is enough for me to support him, as the only thing stopping me from being a member of the party I support (Liberal) is that I am an employee of the Australian Electoral Commission and am ineligble to work if I have a party affiliation. So anything Liberal supports, I do (including Bush). Plus I'm for freeing the Iraqi's, a torture-free future is awaiting them.
He gets support from our Prime Minister, so that is enough for me to support him, as the only thing stopping me from being a member of the party I support (Liberal) is that I am an employee of the Australian Electoral Commission and am ineligble to work if I have a party affiliation. So anything Liberal supports, I do (including Bush). Plus I'm for freeing the Iraqi's, a torture-free future is awaiting them.
Last edited:
http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/election2004.jsp?feature=ne_election5
Right click on the pic of george bush and his wife and go to properties
Right click on the pic of george bush and his wife and go to properties
what's wrong with it?
CNN starting naming their pics of Bush as "-------.jpg" and "moron.jpg".
Of course the press is unbiased.
I am glad to see the left lose. After all they put into Michael Moore, the Clarke book, the commission, and all these things - this HATRED of conservatives and Bush - they threw in this election it is a GREAT DAY to see it all FAIL.
All the Dems have to show for their "unperecedented effort" and "energized base" is Barack Obama in Illinois who was a shoo in and a Conservative Democrat Salazar in Colorado.
The most rewarding part is seeing the depression and anger on the democrats side. My poly sci teacher in class had tears in her eyes. That was the best. The left was so out of touch with reality that they thought since they hate Bush everyone else does too.
I love it!
Of course the press is unbiased.
I am glad to see the left lose. After all they put into Michael Moore, the Clarke book, the commission, and all these things - this HATRED of conservatives and Bush - they threw in this election it is a GREAT DAY to see it all FAIL.
All the Dems have to show for their "unperecedented effort" and "energized base" is Barack Obama in Illinois who was a shoo in and a Conservative Democrat Salazar in Colorado.
The most rewarding part is seeing the depression and anger on the democrats side. My poly sci teacher in class had tears in her eyes. That was the best. The left was so out of touch with reality that they thought since they hate Bush everyone else does too.
I love it!
To be fair, it does work both ways though, look at the murdoch media co's, ie. Fox news... I do believe we need more pro right-wing press though.
And celebrities, where do they get off telling people who to vote for? The average celebrity (especially musicians *cough* Rock Against Bush HAHAHA *cough*) would probably have 1/5 of the IQ of the average citizen. This comes straight from Chris Isaaks mouth, what a legend he is.
All you Demo's, you should be happy, coz now you can hear "intelligent" actors tell you why Bush is bad for another 4 years. And buy more "great" activism CD's like Greenday's new one or Rock Against Bush.
HAHA. Anyways, I'm spent.
Yahpoolerz
Active Member
At the voting polls in North Carolina, there were only like 2 or 3 people with Kerry signs, the hundred rest had Bush Cheney signs.
*most likely the opposite in California
lol
GO BUSH!!!
*most likely the opposite in California
lol
GO BUSH!!!
the people who run the nation, everyone!Conscript said:
anywho, should anyone refute to the 'the left are out of touch with society' by pointing out to the right's tendency to be overly religious and base decisions from religion, and whatnot, and believing homosexuality to be a lifestyle, not a nature issue, and so deny these people their natural rights (discouraging them, blocking their rights of living like a normal human, and ostracizing them just because they were born a certain way..?)...
how about an OBJECTIVE press?bozley05 said:
oh, the irony. someone preaching 'intelligence' and the intelligence of someone when they... err.. well i won't point out explicitely why it's ironic, because that's mean, and maybe a personal attack.
anywho, since you mention intelligence:
nope.. north carolina not too high...
in 2000:
north carolina definitely not too high! look at california, where you say all the actors are. hmm...
atlas
New Member
Conscript said:
You enjoy seeing a divided country? You delight in someone's tears because they believe their country made a horrible mistake? Even if you think they are wrong, why would you take pleasure in that?
Have you ever considered that perhaps you're the one so out of touch with reality? Just because 51% of voters in the U.S. voted for Bush doesn't mean they are "in touch."
Even after the final report of Charles Duelfer to Congress saying that Iraq did not have a significant WMD program, 72% of Bush supporters continue to believe that Iraq had actual WMD (47%) or a major program for developing them (25%). Fifty-six percent assume that most experts believe Iraq had actual WMD and 57% also assume, incorrectly, that Duelfer concluded Iraq had at least a major WMD program.
Similarly, 75% of Bush supporters continue to believe that Iraq was providing substantial support to al Qaeda, and 63% believe that clear evidence of this support has been found. Sixty percent of Bush supporters assume that this is also the conclusion of most experts, and 55% assume, incorrectly, that this was the conclusion of the 9/11 Commission.
(from a study conducted in October 2004)
Reference: http://pipa.org/
Fuzzylogic
New Member
HEY! i'll support that. It would solve lots of problems. They wouldn't interfer with other countries affairs for starters. So americans continues arguing amoung yourselves and keep the world safeDaniel said:
[/sarcasm]
Absolutley and the reason is the way they went about this whole election. They ran a campaign of hate and conspiracy theories. Despite bin Laden now admitting that he did 9/11 there are still some kooks who think it was an inside job.
They ran on fear and hate. Their entire last year was focused on hating conservatives and hating Bush. Liberals were just so mean spirited that they deserved to lose. From the lies of Michael Moore's new movie to the forged papers from the national guard, to the partisanship of the 9/11 commission to the 60 minutes "anti-Bush book of the month club" it ALL FAILED.
Libs deserved to lose for being so mean spirited, for lying, for distorting, for HATING. That's why its so sweet to see them lose after they've invested so much emotion, lies, and hatred into this campaign.
you can't tell me that the bush campaigns weren't mean spirited, weren't attempting to spawn hatred towards kerry or democrats, haven't lied, haven't distorbed information (and they have, insanely; so many people still think there are wmds in iraq and saddam had connections to al qaeda; or, say, kerry's 'flip flops', another set of lies); you cant say that his administration hasn't lied or denied things to the american people (ie., holding back 9/11 report because it might be embarassing for the administration?)
here's an example: just a few days before the election, the republican campaign set off recordign messages calling random houses to 'vote for kerry so gay marraige can be achieved,' or bush campaigners out in the streets with signs supporting gay marriage, a long with a kerry/edwards sign, or 'pro-life! pro abortion!' sign along with kerry/edwards. that isn't distorting, hating, unfair? seems to me it is.
why don't you just come to terms and say BOTH sides were 'equally dirty'?
here's an example: just a few days before the election, the republican campaign set off recordign messages calling random houses to 'vote for kerry so gay marraige can be achieved,' or bush campaigners out in the streets with signs supporting gay marriage, a long with a kerry/edwards sign, or 'pro-life! pro abortion!' sign along with kerry/edwards. that isn't distorting, hating, unfair? seems to me it is.
why don't you just come to terms and say BOTH sides were 'equally dirty'?
