• Howdy! Welcome to our community of more than 130.000 members devoted to web hosting. This is a great place to get special offers from web hosts and post your own requests or ads. To start posting sign up here. Cheers! /Peo, FreeWebSpace.net

Terrorist Guilty Plead REJECTED?!

is0lized

See Below
A judge today rejected attempts by Zaccaria's Moussaoui, indicted in connection with September 11 attacks, to plead guilty during a federal court hearing...

Does the judge feel bad for this guy or something, how could he just reject his plea like that
 
She was only trying to protect his interests. The manner in which he blurted it out was wrong to say the least so she told him to take a week and rethink it. I think just about any judge would have done the same if the person was representing himself or herself or the judge felt that person may not realize the repercussions to his/her actions.

He says he wants to plead guilty to save his life but I don't think you can really believe that. If that was the case he would have plea-bargained that and I'm sure the government would have accepted since he claims to have knowledge of future plans.

I could be way off as I haven't been following this case but my guess is this person wants to be found guilty and I wouldn't be surprised if he wants to die. Why? He continues to pledge himself to Al qaeda and if you are loyal to a country/group you would be proud of your actions because you would feel they are right. If he follows what he has been told if he dies he will go to a form of heaven with virgins all around him. (This covers it: http://charlotte.creativeloafing.com/newsstand/2002-04-10/homefront.html)

Clearly if he followed his own beliefs and remained loyal to Al qaeda be happy to die as a martyr to his cause. Lets not forget that he wouldn't want to spend life in prison as this whole country is going to be destroyed by Al qaeda.. :rolleyes:
 
In a capitol case the defendant plead guilty. Later in an appeals court the trial was thrown out; the court cited the defendant can't plead guilty in a capitol case.
Since this man is on trial for 9/11 he is looking at the death penalty. The judge couldn't allow such a plea.
 
Originally posted by is0lized
A judge today rejected attempts by Zaccaria's Moussaoui, indicted in connection with September 11 attacks, to plead guilty during a federal court hearing...

Does the judge feel bad for this guy or something, how could he just reject his plea like that

he is legally insaint at that time. he wasn't thinking straight. so the higher court going to turn down that plead anyway. if she accepted the guilty plead.. and when a higher court over turn a lower court judge decision, it doesn't make him or her look to good.
 
He is defending himself and refuses to have a lawyer. He doesn't understand how the system works and has been making non-sensical motions, demands and arguments. At one point he pled "No contest", thinking that it would give him a chance to plead his case, but not realizing that this meant guilty.

The court has a legal responsibility to protect him and be assured that he has competant legal advice. If he pleads guilty and is convicted he could appeal it later claiming that he was insane, wasn't properly aware of his options and had no legal counsel. The court has to make sure that proper process is followed.

Do you let a crazy incompetant person plead guilty?
 
Dv it might not be so simple to think of him as just a moron. His reasons are not reasonable to us the average citizen. But, he is an al qaida operative. The 20th hijacker! He hates the US. He thinks that our government must be the devil literally. Theres no way he reasons he should play the devils game so he decides to go for the quick end.
 
Originally posted by shizzle
Look... if he pleads guilty, he gets a lighter sentance, we cant allow that.

u dont' get a lighter sentence if you pledge guilty. you get what ever sentence the judge fell like.
 
well sentencing doesn't is not the problem. 60 years and prision is the same as 40 he would spend life of his time there. And hes not getting the death penality.. i can assure that.
 
I predict he'll get off. Remember...there's evidence that they all didn't know what they were going to terrorize until the last moment. ogre2
 
he's not getting the death penalty, cause he didn't kill anyone. trying to kill its not the same as killing. I am pretty sure every court case is made public is there a place where we can get the court case, besides going to the house of congress?
 
Of course you can be executed for not killing anyone. There is precedent for this. The Rosenburgs were executed for giving US nuclear secerets to the Soviets. Don't forget 9-11 is on trial!!! Thats what seems to escape everyone who thinks he might get life.
 
well that is different america made up a law where if you commit treason you get excuted. but that guy didn't commit any treason just plan to kill people..
 
No you still can get executed for treason. Its been there ever since this nation was born. Recently Hanson was going to get the death penalty but he cooperated.

You think the government is pursuing the death penalty because they don't the law? They are pursuing because of course you can be executed for conspiring to kill people.
 
um lotsofissue read what i post before I said "if you commit treason you get executed"

that is what i said. and the goverment can charge who ever whatever they like they can charge him for being a dictator, a communist, a captilist, a femist, a murder , a terriost, and other stuff they can charge. But would they be able to prove it ? no!

Of course the goverment know there laws, they made it, they just when for the death penatly not casue they know they can get a guilty verdict, but just to make you americans happy. What would you respone if they only care him with conspercy, everyone go crazy so they when for the dealth penalty to make us happy.

Ex. The american taliban, they know that they wont' get a guilty verdict for treason, cause they can't prove it. they still when a head and charge him for it, to make us happy.
 
They are pursuing because of course you can be executed for conspiring to kill people. [/B]


umm. that show you knows nothing or little about law, you don't get the execute for conspiring to kill. so get your facts straight before responding.
 
From cnn.com

The four counts he faces that carry a potential death penalty are conspiracy to commit acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries; conspiracy to commit aircraft piracy; conspiracy to destroy aircraft and conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction.


Johnny, the U.S. government can't just make up rules and then make them retroactive to accuse people. All of these laws are on the books. From your other postings you generally seem to disagree with everything the U.S. does. I find it interesting when people share their own opinions, but I'd ask that you stick to facts rather than sensational tidbits.
 
Back
Top