Originally posted by wwalsh
Some might take solace from your assertion, but the truth is that the facts in this case do not back you up. Your own statements in the past on this incident contradict your claims here. As far as I am concerned, you have no credibilty at all on these issues. But, webmasters depending on these kinds of ad companies, such as SI, who are literally at the bottom of the food chain in the ad business already, should expect these kinds of things from your company and the others like them. Being the dregs of the industry gives you some latitude in getting away with this kind of crap. The truth is the only defense to libel, and you claim to have it on your side. I wonder if a judge would agree with you.